Dnevnik.bg

"По повод изявленията на Москва, че сирийците трябва сами да решат каква ще е съдбата на президента Башар Асад, Хейг подчерта, че сирийците не могат да решават какво ще бъде
бъдещето им, ако се избиват помежду си"

Що да не може?
Всеки заслужава съдбата си.
Щом са решили да се избиват, никой не може да ги спре.

Време е да разбомбите Сирия прецизно с обеднен уран. И без това агентите на SAS и MI6 са в Сирия като у дома си.

Даааа, страшно много прилича на Босна и Херцеговина! И тогава Западът и Светът нищо не направиха за да спрат кръвопролитията. Даже Сините каски нищо не свършиха, присъстваха.

Великите руски интереси..

"От тях 9862 са цивилни, 3470 са военни и 83 са дезертьори от сирийската армия."

83 загинали дезертьори... ето това доказва,че е пълна измислица твърдението,че сирийските войници дезертират масово,ако изобщо тези цифри са реални.
А бунтовниците-ислямисти с базуки и автомати към цивилните ли ги водят?Или тях не ги включват в тази статистика,защото се говори за сирийски граждани?

вярна оценка. Да очакваме категоризиране на конфликта по Глава 7 от Хартата на ООН

Syrian Rebels Set Trap for British Journalists

The obvious question that comes to mind upon reading Thomson’s account, along with emerging evidence that the Western press willfully lied about the Houla Massacre and is attempting to do so again regarding killings in Hama, is that “if rebels are willing to try and kill foreign journalists for propaganda value – men and women merely trying to do their job, to share with the world the truth about unfolding events in Syria – just to blame the deaths on the Syrian government, why wouldn’t they kill men, women and children to blame on the Syrian government as well?”

Another pertinent question would be, “what if the rebels had succeeded in their insidious plan to have Thomson and his team killed? Would the Western press commit themselves to due diligence in ascertaining the truth surrounding the circumstances of their deaths? Or would headlines read, “BRITISH JOURNALISTS SLAUGHTERED BY ASSAD!”

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.ca/2012/06/syrian-rebels-set-trap-for-british.html

Rebel groups in Syria backed by NATO?

Interview with Rick Rozoff, the manager and the owner of the STOP
NATO website and mailing list, and a regular contributor to the Voice of Russia.

What correlations do you see between the situation going on in Syria and Kosovo? What do you know about rebel groups in Syria being funded and backed by NATO?

I mean, we all have heard and it’s a matter of substantiating it, but I think we have enough proof already to establish the fact. The parallel to Kosovo you draw is remarkable given what occurred earlier yesterday, where NATO troops and armored personnel, carriers, vehicles faced off against ethnic protesters in the north of Kosovo, firing live ammunition at them, as well as deploying helicopters, gunships and so force, and what is currently going on in Syria.

As a matter of fact the parallels are so striking at times as to suggest that the western governments, those backing the so-called Free Syrian Army armed rebel forces inside Syria are playing from the same script as they did in Yugoslavia 13 years ago in support the so-called Kosovo Liberation Army there.

And there are direct connections between the two of them. For example, last month, a self-proclaimed rebel leader or opposition leader Syrian born Ammar Abdulhamid, who has been living in Washington and was a former visiting scholar at Brookings Institution until recently, came to the United States as head of a delegation of opposition figures in Syria to visit with U.S. officials, government officials. And immediately afterwards he flew into Pristine, the capital of Kosovo, to meet with leaders of the government to a former KLA fighters, such as Prime Minister Hashim Thaci and others, and quite bluntly told Associated Press in May that he was studying the Kosovo example to be replicated in Syria even stating that he was particularly impressed with how the so-called Kosovo Liberation Army able to integrate various armed groups. From which we can understand many instances are nothing more than criminal underworld militias into a fighting force, which was then coordinated with the United States and NATO during the bombing war against Yugoslavia in 1999.

So we have a direct connection there. And we can also base what’s going on in Syria with reports that fighters in Libya have joined rebel groups inside Syria, so that we have an international network of extremist fighters that first earned their stripes, if you will, in Afghanistan during the CIA operation Phoenix against the government of Afghanistan and their Soviet backers in the 1980s. And I am thinking particularly of the commander of the Libyan rebel forces last year Abdelhakim Belhadj, who had fought in Afghanistan with the Afghan mujahideen, who was rumored to have met with and collaborated with Mullah Omar of al-Qaeda, was subsequently interned as part of the extraordinary rendition program by the United States and returned to Libya, where he was a head of something called the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, and then became the leader, the top commander of the Libyan rebels last year, and that forces loyal to him that had fought under his command are now in Syria, now I think is distinct possibility. So, we see the connections emerging over 30 years of the United States.

So, you are saying he was recruited and now his people are in Syria doing the U.S. government’s bidding?

There have been reports for several months that Syrian fighters, of those who fought on behalf of the Transitional National Council and in coordination with both NATO bombing campaign against Libya for 6 months last year but also with reports of British, French, Italian and other special operations troops as well as those Arab Gulf states like Qatar and United Arab Emirates fighting in Lybia, this would seem to be a model that can be exported to other countries. There have certainly been reports that Libyan and other foreign fighters who have crossed the borders of Iraq and Lebanon into Syria to fight with the so-called Free Syrian Army.

Now with this massacre in Houla, the UN’s own observer said it was not the fault of Syrian forces. Despite that Hillary Clinton has been making comments and it seems like the U.S. in continuing with their own narrative.

I mean you are correct that the west, the U.S. in the first instance and its western European allies as well as Australia and Japan, which for all intensive purposes are a part of the West, have withdrawn their ambassadors, and rather have expelled Syrian Ambassadors from their capitals.

And this is a concentrated effort to present the tragedy in Houla and it is a tragedy that over 100 lives were lost as not only the work of the Syrian government but exclusively the work of the Syrian government, whereas Russia, China, Cuba and other countries have urged a methodical dispassionate investigation into the events as terrible as they are to determine the actual cause and the actual perpetrators. So, nobody has a definite answer to what occurred in Houla and until there is one, this is again evocative of what the U.S. did with Yugoslavia in January 1999 around the so-called Racak massacre in Kosovo where the bodies of several dozen young ethnic Albanian men were identified as having been massacred by Serbian and Yugoslav security forces even though there are contradictory reports and the Serbian government’s position was these were KLA fighters who were killed in action.

And the Russian Foreign Ministry a few weeks ago, maybe less than two and a half weeks ago, when the report surfaced of the Syrian delegation going to Kosovo that we spoke about a moment ago, denounced that saying that in fact what the delegation was going there for was to study the example or receive military training for their fighters inside Kosovo with even the observation that some of the topographical similarities between the two countries, that would make Kosovo an ideal place to study the sort of Guerrilla warfare KLA conducted in conjunction with NATO during the bombing of Yugoslavia 13 years ago.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said that Houla massacre would not have been possible if the perpetrators had not received arms and funding from abroad meaning from the west.

We know Free Syrian Army is harbored, not only given refuge, but presumably they are training the army inside Turkey. A report several months ago in Daily Telegraph of Britain sited a member of Syrian opposition boasting of having 15,000 fighters inside Turkey, which is a breech of interstate relations.
http://english.ruvr.ru/2012_06_09/77630671/

До коментар [#3] от "marsena":

При една война между два народа,когато тя все някога свърши,враждуващите се прибират в родината си. Дори едната страна да окупира другата,то завладените все пак си остават у дома.
Докато гадното при една братоубийствена Гражданска война е,че победените няма къде да отидат. И ще емигрират в други страни,а това вече ни засяга.
Когато избухна гражданска война в Китай и комунистите победиха,чест прави на САЩ,че се намесиха и осигуриха родно парче земя (Тайван),на победените националисти.

Russia: West Purposefully Sabotaging Peace in Syria
Also, German paper FAZ reports Houla was the work of rebels, not pro-Assad militias.
by Tony Cartalucci

June 10, 2012 - In his most recent statement, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov repeated that Russia opposes any attempt to intervene or level sanctions against Syria. He also exposed the West's role in purposefully perpetuating violence in order to sabotage peace efforts and create a pretense for NATO-enforced regime change. He warned, "the way the Syrian crisis is resolved will play an important role in the world tomorrow; whether the world will be based on the UN charter, or a place where might makes right." This after US ambassador to the UN Susan Rice declared the West was prepared to "take actions outside of the Annan plan and the authority of this [UN security] council," to implement regime change in Syria.

Lavrov's sentiments were echoed by China, Iran, and South America's ALBA nations, whose collective populations equate to over 1.5 billion people.


Video: Russia's stance reflects a growing global consensus of independent journalists and geopolitical analysts who have meticulously and objectively documented a timeline of what is certainly a premeditated destabilization of Syria by the West. Professor Michel Chossudovsky of Global Research gives perhaps the most comprehensive back-story on Syria's conflict to-date.
....

Lavrov made his statements during a conference held yesterday, focusing on evidence contradicting the politically motivated coverage of Syria's conflict by the Western media - the latest example of which was in fact the West's coverage of Lavrov's comments themselves. Western papers declared different variations of, "Russia supports departure of Assad," in sensational headlines that purposefully took Lavrov's statements out of context.

Conversely, and more accurately, RT reported, "Annan plan 'only chance for peace' but stalled by intervention supporters - Lavrov." For those who actually watched Lavrov's conference live, this was the overall message - with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad stepping down if, and only if, unconditional negotiations began, and both sides could come to an agreement independent of foreign influence. But as Lavrov illustrated, the Syrian "opposition" is entirely propped up by the West and its Gulf State allies.


West's "Houla Impetus" Unraveling, Major German Paper Implicates Rebels, not Regime

Of course, the US' pretext for making such bold statements has been the recent "Houla Massacre," pinned on the Syrian government even before UN monitors arrived on the scene. Similarly, Western media has been reporting "activist" hearsay regarding a string of additional "massacres," none of which have been confirmed in an attempt to generate general hysteria and support for a broader intervention.

In a recent development, Germany's Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) paper has reported (Google English translation here) that evidence indicates rebels, not pro-government militias, were responsible for the violence at Houla, and that many of the victims were in fact supporters of the Syrian government. Covered by John Rosenthal in the National Review Online, his article warns of "rebel atrocities being repackaged in both Arab and Western media accounts as regime atrocities."

Already, Western press has backpedaled and been caught outright fabricating evidence in regards to the Houla Massacre, with the BBC even being caught using pictures taken from Iraq years ago for their Syrian coverage. This latest account from FAZ further indicates that indeed the West is engaged in a vast campaign of war propaganda to do exactly what Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov has warned they are doing, attempting to fill the international community with indignation, and "start a full-blown intervention in Syria."
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.ca/2012/06/russia-west-purposefully-sabotaging.html

Какво разбират британците от политика и то на ниво външен министър?Само се излага!

Тоя може би цитира нашмъркания Алън Коп''ле - виден британски политик !

Да не пращат фрагилни холандски миротворци, тогава! Да се удари силно, изведнъж и окончателно!